Scio Village

One hundred and thirty brownstone-style condominiums built 2002 to 2004

At a glance
LocationScio Township, off South Zeeb Road between Jackson Road and West Liberty, west of Ann Arbor; Ann Arbor mailing address; Washtenaw County
Built2002–2004
Housing130 condominiums and townhomes in a brownstone style, single-story and two-story plans
SchoolsAnn Arbor Public Schools
BuilderMaster Key Northern
Era2002–2004 build: past the older-era concerns; first-generation furnace, AC and roof reach end of life around 20–25 years, and a storage water heater well before that

Era notes describe what a build date makes likely across houses of that period. A year built is not proof of what any one property contains: materials, alterations and equipment are established from the records and an appropriate inspection.

School assignments can shift over time. Confirm the assignment for a specific address — the district and the individual school — with the school district.

By the numbers
For sale3 homes, median asking $296K
Under contract1 home
Sold, 6 months6 sales, median $307K
Sold over asking50% of sales
Per sq ft$205 sold
Typical home2 bed, 1,584 sq ft at the median
Built2002 to 2003
Association fee$330 monthly
WaterPublic
School districtAnn Arbor

From MichRIC listing data inside the boundary on the map, homes for sale and sales from the last six months together, refreshed with the feed (Oct 9). Below five sales a row gives the range rather than a median.

Ask about Scio Village
Answered personally within one business day. This also creates your free account, so you can come back without a password and keep your details current. Your details are never shared.
The neighborhood

About Scio Village

Scio Village is a community of 130 condominiums and townhomes off South Zeeb Road between Jackson Road and West Liberty, in Scio Township.

They were built by Master Key Northern between 2002 and 2004 in a brownstone idiom, across single-story and two-story plans, and the community maintains its own association.

Worth knowing
  • —130 units across a three-year build gives genuine comparable data
  • —A brownstone idiom dates more slowly than the idiom of its own moment
  • —Establish whether the cladding is real masonry or a masonry-look composite
  • —At 130 units a major program divides into an absorbable figure
  • —A low assessment at twenty years can mean discipline or deferral
  • —A facade full of window openings is a facade full of junctions

Brownstone style, and what it is borrowing

Brownstone properly describes a brown sandstone used extensively in nineteenth-century eastern American cities, and the terraced houses faced in it. As a style label on a Michigan condominium of 2002, it is describing an idiom rather than a material.

What it generally means in practice is a row of attached units with a strong vertical rhythm, a raised entrance, a relatively flat facade with the window openings doing the compositional work, and a masonry or masonry-look cladding in a dark warm tone. It reads as urban and traditional rather than suburban and contemporary.

That is a deliberate choice and a reasonably durable one. A house built in the prevailing idiom of its moment dates identifiably when the moment passes; a house built against a longer tradition dates more slowly. This is the same argument that applies to the modern farmhouse stock of the 2020s, running in the opposite direction.

The practical question is the same as for any traditionally detailed modern building: what the materials actually are. Genuine masonry and a masonry-look composite read similarly at a distance and have different maintenance futures — real masonry has repointing, lintels and weep holes; a composite has a service life and a replacement cycle. Establish which is present, because in a condominium it is the association's cost either way and it belongs in the reserve study.

One hundred and thirty units is a favorable size

This site has covered associations from two units to over three hundred, and 130 sits in the range where the arithmetic works well.

A major program — roofs, drives, siding — divides into a per-unit figure most owners can absorb, unlike the small buildings elsewhere in the area where a single repair divides by a handful. At the same time it is small enough to remain legible: an owner can understand the budget and reach the board.

It also produces genuine comparable data. One hundred and thirty units across a three-year build generate real turnover year after year on similar product, which is the scarcest thing in a comparable-sales analysis and which most communities here do not have.

Where a builder used a defined set of plans across that many units, same-model comparables exist — the tightest form of comparable there is. Identifying which plan a unit is, and finding a recent sale of the same one, is what turns an approximate analysis into a tight one, and a listing does not always say which.

Single-story and two-story plans are two different products drawing partly different buyers. Demand for single-level living is persistent and comes from more than one direction, and it does not shrink; a two-story unit delivers more area on a narrower footprint. Match on form as well as area.

A young association reaching its first cycle

Built 2002 to 2004, this community is around twenty years old, and that position is easy to misread.

It has spent two decades collecting assessments against major expenses that have not yet arrived — roofs, drives, siding across the whole community. Whether it actually set that money aside, rather than keeping assessments low while everything was new enough not to need anything, is the whole question.

A low assessment in a twenty-year-old community is therefore not the reassurance it appears to be. It can equally mean reserves were kept thin, with the reckoning arriving as a special assessment when the first major cycle comes due — which is now.

So the reserve study is the document, and the specific question is whether the funded percentage is adequate against the schedule of upcoming replacements, not whether the monthly figure is comfortable. Across 130 units a shortfall divides more forgivingly than in a small building, but a shortfall is still a shortfall.

Ask also when control transitioned from the developer to the owners, and read the minutes for any discussion of roofs, drives or exterior work.

At twenty years, the envelope

A building of this age concentrates an inspection considerably, because most of what an older building raises does not apply.

These were built to a modern energy code with modern insulation, modern electrical service and modern egress.

On the list is the first replacement cycle arriving. Original furnaces, air conditioning and water heaters are approaching or at the end of typical service lives. Original roofs are approaching a first replacement, which in a condominium is the association's expense. Original double-glazed windows begin to show seal failure as fogging between the panes.

What does matter at this age is the building envelope — flashing, sealants, roof details and the junctions around windows, doors and any deck or balcony. Sealants have a service life measured in years rather than decades, and twenty years is long enough for original detailing to have proved itself or not. Modern buildings do not fail through their materials; they fail at their joints.

A brownstone idiom with a strong vertical rhythm also means a good many window openings, and every opening is a junction. That is worth directing an inspector at specifically.

Ann Arbor address, Scio Township government

Scio Township surrounds the City of Ann Arbor on the west and is a separate government with its own board, tax rate, services, zoning and assessor. A great many Scio Township mailing addresses read Ann Arbor, because a mailing address is a delivery route rather than a jurisdiction.

The tax rate differs, sometimes substantially, for otherwise identical properties — which is why comparable sales must be matched on municipality or the analysis imports an error nothing in the paperwork flags.

School assignment follows a third line again and does not track the municipal boundary.

A very small association changes the arithmetic

In a condominium the roofs, facades, drives and shared systems belong to the association, and their age lands on its budget. In a very small building that principle stops being general and becomes arithmetic.

A roof replacement across a 200-unit community divides into a per-unit figure most owners can absorb. The same work in a building of a handful of units divides by a handful. There is almost no dilution — each owner carries a large fraction of every major expense, and a single significant repair can arrive as a special assessment of real size.

That cuts both ways and the good side is genuine. A small association is easier to run, easier to get a decision out of, and far less likely to be captured by an unresponsive board or an expensive management contract. Owners generally know one another and know the building. Reserves, where they exist, are simpler to understand.

But it makes the reserve study more consequential rather than less, and it makes the specific questions sharper. What are the major common elements, when is each due, and what is actually set aside? Is there professional management, or is it run by the owners? And has there been a special assessment — in a building this size, one is a much more likely event than in a large community.

The documents, in order

The reserve study comes first, ahead of the inspection of the unit itself, because whatever the association is responsible for, its age lands on the association's budget rather than the owner's.

The five-year assessment history comes second and is more informative than the current figure. A single-level unit assessment across five years against ageing common elements is a question rather than a reassurance — it can mean disciplined management or deferral, and the reserve study tells you which.

The master deed's division of responsibility comes third: which elements are general common, which are limited common and assigned to a particular unit, and which belong to the owner outright. In a downtown building that division commonly covers windows, balconies, the facade and any parking space, and it varies between associations.

Then the recent minutes, where a pending special assessment or a long-running dispute surfaces before it reaches a disclosure.

Schools

This community is served by Ann Arbor Public Schools. District boundaries are redrawn from time to time.

Assignment is set by address rather than by neighborhood or building name, and district boundaries in this county cross municipal and postal lines routinely. District is one of the larger drivers of price difference between otherwise comparable properties, so comparables should be matched on it as well as on municipality.

Buying or selling here

The plan and the reserve position are the two things to establish, and both are documented.

For a seller, naming which plan a unit is, whether it is single or two story, and its position in the row gives an appraiser the right comparables in a community where genuinely comparable sales exist — which is not true of most communities around here.

Community details reflect public records and local knowledge and can change — always verify what matters to your purchase. Explore more of Ann Arbor's neighborhoods, or browse active listings.