Oslund

An architect-designed community from 1990, off Glazier Way

At a glance
LocationCity of Ann Arbor, northeast side, off Glazier Way east of Huron Parkway; M-14 a short run; Washtenaw County
BuiltAround 1990
HousingRanches, townhomes and condominium units, roughly 2,000–3,000 sq ft, 3–4 bedrooms
SchoolsAnn Arbor Public Schools
ArchitectDavid Osler
NearbyUniversity of Michigan North Campus and the North Campus Research Complex; Gallup Park and the Huron River a short run
Era1990 build: inside the polybutylene supply-pipe window; hardboard and composite siding of the period depends on how edges were sealed

Era notes describe what a build date makes likely across houses of that period. A year built is not proof of what any one property contains: materials, alterations and equipment are established from the records and an appropriate inspection.

School assignments can shift over time. Confirm the assignment for a specific address — the district and the individual school — with the school district.

By the numbers
Sold, 6 months1 sale
Typical home3 bed, 1,794 sq ft at the median
Built1987
Association fee$650 monthly
WaterPublic
School districtAnn Arbor

From MichRIC listing data inside the boundary on the map, homes for sale and sales from the last six months together, refreshed with the feed (Oct 9). Below five sales a row gives the range rather than a median.

Ask about Oslund
Answered personally within one business day. This also creates your free account, so you can come back without a password and keep your details current. Your details are never shared.
The neighborhood

About Oslund

Oslund is an Ann Arbor condominium community built around 1990, designed by the architect David Osler, with ranches, townhomes and condominium units running roughly 2,000 to 3,000 square feet and three to four bedrooms.

It sits off Glazier Way east of Huron Parkway, with M-14 a short run. An architect-designed community of this size is unusual, and the design provenance is the most consequential thing about it.

Worth knowing
  • —An architect-designed community is a different origin from a builder-designed one
  • —Design quality is a real value factor no algorithm can see
  • —A detached ranch in Michigan may still be a site condominium
  • —A 1990 build sits squarely inside the polybutylene window
  • —In a condominium, the master deed decides who pays to replace the piping

Architect-designed, which changes the analysis

Most residential communities around here were designed by their builders from plans that had been built before. A named architect designing a community deliberately is a different origin, and it is worth understanding what that does.

What it generally produces is more considered decisions about massing, circulation, natural light, materials and how buildings sit on their ground — the sort of thinking a catalog plan dropped onto a site does not do. Where it is done well, the result works better than its specification suggests, and those are qualities a square-footage comparison cannot see and an automated valuation cannot price at all.

So a figure from a model should be treated as a starting hypothesis rather than an answer. A properly constructed analysis, by somebody who has walked the buildings, is worth more here than in a catalog-built subdivision.

For a seller, the design provenance is a checkable fact rather than an adjective, and it distinguishes the community from the builder-designed stock it will otherwise be compared against. That distinction has to be made explicitly, because nothing in the public data makes it.

For a buyer, it is worth looking at what the design actually delivers on the ground — the light, the circulation, how the units relate to each other and to the site — because that is what the provenance is claiming and it is straightforward to assess at a showing.

Three forms in one community

Ranches, townhomes and condominium units in one community means three products competing for three different buyer pools, and matching on form matters before matching on area.

The ranch is the form to separate first. Single-level living with no internal stairs reaches a persistent and geographically wide buyer pool — people for whom it is a requirement rather than a preference — and there are always more of those buyers than there are single-level homes. That is why ranches routinely outperform what their measured area suggests, and why the gap tends to widen rather than narrow.

A townhome stacks the space vertically and shares party walls on one or both sides: more space for the money, and a different daily experience.

There is a further Michigan wrinkle. Michigan uses the condominium form for detached houses far more than most states, so a detached ranch here may be a site condominium — legally a condominium unit with the ground around it frequently limited common element rather than owned outright. It is absolute for pricing: a subdivision sale needs adjustment before it can stand as a comparable for a site condominium, or the reverse.

A range from about 2,000 to 3,000 square feet is fifty percent, so the community also holds two price points regardless of form. Match on form, then on area within a band, then adjust for position and condition.

At this size, one item applies regardless of era: how many heating and cooling zones serve a unit. A single zone across 3,000 square feet commonly leaves one part of it uncomfortable, and retrofitting is expensive.

A 1990 build sits inside the polybutylene window

This is the single most consequential era question in this region's housing, and a build around 1990 sits squarely inside it.

It was inexpensive and easy to install, and it developed a reputation for failing at fittings and joints. Some has performed for decades; some has not. What matters is that a building of this age may have it, and the only way to know is to have the piping identified by material during the inspection rather than inferred.

In a condominium there is a wrinkle a house does not have, and it is a large one. Whether supply piping is unit or common element varies with the master deed, and that decides who pays for a replacement and who decides when it happens. Where an association has already re-piped, that is a substantial thing to have behind you and it will appear in the minutes and the reserve history — worth asking about directly.

At around thirty-five years the first full replacement cycle has passed and the second is beginning. Original roofs are well past a typical asphalt shingle service life, so they should have been done at least once — ask when and by whom, and whether it was funded from reserves or by special assessment. Furnaces, air conditioning and water heaters are long beyond expectancy, and original double-glazed windows show seal failure as fogging between the panes.

The item specific to this period is exterior cladding and its edges. Hardboard and early composite products perform according to how their ends, edges and penetrations were sealed, and thirty-five years is long enough for careless detailing to have declared itself.

Glazier Way and the northeast side

This position sits east of Huron Parkway on the northeast side of the city, within reach of the University of Michigan's north campus and the North Campus Research Complex — the former Pfizer research campus the university acquired, which is a more durable kind of institutional neighbor than a corporate site.

M-14 runs west from the northern side of the city and US-23 lies east, which puts a good deal within reasonable reach without crossing the center.

Huron Parkway is a principal north-south route and carries the ordinary corridor trade-off: convenience and traffic in the same package, varying sharply with distance from the road, orientation and what stands between. A weekday rush hour visit with the windows open settles it.

This part of the city also holds a substantial share of Ann Arbor's natural area system, and the Huron River corridor with Gallup Park is a short run. Where any open ground adjoins a specific unit, its durability depends entirely on ownership: publicly held land, land under a recorded conservation easement, association common area, and merely unbuilt private ground are four different assurances that look identical from a window, and one inquiry to the city or a title company settles which applies.

What the association documents decide

Buying a condominium unit means buying into a corporation as well as a home, and the corporation's condition is not visible at a showing. Four documents settle it: the master deed and its exhibits, the bylaws, the current budget and the reserve study.

The master deed defines what the unit actually is — where the boundary runs between unit and common elements, and what limited common elements are assigned to its sole use. That is the most misunderstood part of condominium ownership, and it decides who pays for a great many things.

The bylaws set the rules that govern daily life: what may be altered, what may be parked, whether units may be leased and how many at once, and how the board is elected.

The budget and the reserve study together answer whether the association is solvent. An association with thin reserves and a large component near the end of its life is not cheaper — it is a deferred bill with an unknown date, and it arrives as a special assessment.

Board minutes are where a coming expense, a dispute or a construction defect claim surfaces first, and they are the most informative document nobody reads. I go through the recent ones as a matter of course.

One Michigan detail worth knowing: condominium documents are amended by recorded instrument, so what is recorded governs regardless of what any summary says.

Schools

Oslund is served by Ann Arbor Public Schools. District boundaries are redrawn from time to time.

Buying or selling here

The design provenance and the supply piping are the two things that matter most here, and they pull in opposite directions — one is the argument for the price, the other is the question against it.

For a seller, the architect's name, together with documentation that the supply piping has been replaced and a dated roof, answers both. The first is a fact rather than an adjective and has to be stated because no listing data carries it; the second removes the largest question the era raises.

Community details reflect public records and local knowledge and can change — always verify what matters to your purchase. Explore more of Ann Arbor's neighborhoods, or browse active listings.