Fox Pointe

Forty-two homes that are all the same size, which is almost unheard of

At a glance
LocationPittsfield Township, northeast corner of Lohr Road and Oak Valley Drive; Ann Arbor mailing address; Washtenaw County
Built1999–2000
Housing42 homes, ranches and attached units, 1,380–1,400 sq ft
SchoolsAnn Arbor Public Schools; Bryant-Pattengill Elementary, Tappan Middle School, Pioneer High School
TaxesPittsfield Township rates, not City of Ann Arbor
GroundsLandscaped ponds and wooded lots
DrainageMalletts Creek watershed, a Huron River tributary with its own county drainage district
Era1999–2000 build: built past the aluminum wiring, polybutylene, galvanized pipe and lead paint eras; first-generation furnace, AC and roof reach end of life around 20–25 years, and a storage water heater well before that

Era notes describe what a build date makes likely across houses of that period. A year built is not proof of what any one property contains: materials, alterations and equipment are established from the records and an appropriate inspection.

School assignments can shift over time. Confirm the assignment for a specific address — the district and the individual school — with the school district.

By the numbers
Under contract1 home
Sold, 6 months3 sales, from $288K to $292K
Typical home2 bed, 1,409 sq ft at the median
Built1999
Association fee$375 monthly
WaterPublic
School districtAnn Arbor

From MichRIC listing data inside the boundary on the map, homes for sale and sales from the last six months together, refreshed with the feed (Oct 9). Below five sales a row gives the range rather than a median.

Ask about Fox Pointe
Answered personally within one business day. This also creates your free account, so you can come back without a password and keep your details current. Your details are never shared.
The neighborhood

About Fox Pointe

Fox Pointe is a condominium community of 42 homes off Oak Valley by Lohr Road, built in 1999 and 2000, with ranches and attached units running 1,380 to 1,400 square feet, landscaped ponds and wooded lots.

A twenty-square-foot spread across a whole community is the narrowest range around here by a wide margin, and it changes how the place should be priced entirely.

Worth knowing
  • —A one and a half percent size range removes the dominant comparable variable
  • —Everything the model cannot see does the pricing instead
  • —A well-positioned, updated home is worth more than any model will say
  • —Two homes at the same stated area here are not the same value
  • —The comparable set is unusually clean — no size adjustment to argue about
  • —In 42 homes, a roofing cycle has no cushion of numbers to spread it

When the units are effectively identical, area stops being a variable

From 1,380 to 1,400 square feet is a spread of under one and a half percent. For practical purposes these homes are the same size as each other.

That is genuinely unusual. The narrowest range otherwise found nearby was around twelve percent, and most communities run considerably wider — several past a hundred and eighty. Here the variable that dominates almost every comparable analysis has been removed.

What that means is that everything else does the pricing, and those things are precisely what an automated valuation handles worst. Form — whether a home is a detached ranch or an attached unit. Position — what it faces, whether it backs onto water or woods or another building, whether it is an end unit. Condition and updating — the kitchen, the bathrooms, the mechanicals, the roof. Any of those can move a figure further than the entire twenty-square-foot range between the largest and smallest home.

A model given a community name, a square footage and a year will produce nearly the same number for every home here, because on its inputs they are nearly the same home. The spread of actual sale prices will be considerably wider than that, and the difference is entirely the things the model cannot see.

So this is one of the clearest cases in the directory for a constructed analysis over a looked-up one, and it works in both directions. A seller of a well-positioned, well-updated home should expect and argue for a figure above what a model will produce. A buyer should not assume that two homes at the same stated area are the same value.

The compensating advantage is that the comparable set is unusually clean once position and condition are accounted for. There is no adjustment for size to argue about, which removes the most contested variable in most negotiations.

Forty-two homes is a small association

An association's fixed costs do not scale down. Insurance, management, accounting, the audit or review, legal advice and the reserve study cost broadly what they cost whether there are forty-two homes or four hundred. Divided by forty-two, each is a much larger line on every owner's statement.

The large replacements work the same way. Where the association is responsible for roofs, siding or driveways, the whole bill lands on forty-two households with no cushion of numbers to spread it. At twenty-five years, a roofing cycle across the community is precisely what a reserve fund exists for — and precisely what produces a special assessment where one was not built.

So the reserve study is the most important document here and its absence the most important finding. Ask what the association is responsible for replacing, when each of those components was last done, what the reserve balance is, and whether the study is current.

The compensating advantages are real. Forty-two owners can understand their own accounts in full, decisions do not disappear into a management company, and neighbors know what the roofs have cost and what is coming. Small associations are frequently better run than large ones — but when they are not, there is nowhere to hide.

A 1999 to 2000 build at twenty-five years

A two-year build window is as tight as a build window gets, which means the homes are genuinely one product — one code cycle, one generation of materials, one construction period. Combined with the size uniformity, this is about as consistent a community as exists here.

The era removes a great deal. Aluminum branch circuit wiring, polybutylene supply piping, galvanized steel piping and lead-based paint disclosure all belong to earlier decades. These are modern-code buildings with modern insulation, modern electrical service and modern egress.

What twenty-five years brings is the first full replacement cycle, arriving across all forty-two homes at once because they were built together. Original roofs are at or past the end of a typical asphalt shingle service life. Original furnaces, air conditioning and water heaters are at or beyond normal expectancy. Original double-glazed windows show seal failure as fogging between the panes.

Because the whole community came due together in a small association, a home where that work has been done and documented stands out sharply against one where it has not — and in a community where size does not differentiate homes, that difference is proportionally larger than usual.

The item specific to this period is exterior cladding and its edges. Composite and hardboard products perform according to how their ends, edges and penetrations were sealed and how the ground drains away. The bottom courses, and anywhere a deck or porch meets a wall, are where to look.

Attic ventilation is worth a specific look at this age, since poor ventilation shortens shingle life measurably and the difference is exactly what starts to show now.

Ponds and wooded lots, and what protects each

Most ponds inside residential developments of this period are doing stormwater duty alongside their amenity role. Where a pond is an engineered detention or retention basin, its level is designed to fluctuate — which surprises people expecting a constant ornamental water body in a dry August — and its condition is functional rather than cosmetic.

The obligations are consistently underestimated: ponds silt, weed and occasionally need dredging, which is expensive and easy to defer; any outlet structure carries its own inspection duties; edges erode; and a fountain or aerator is machinery with a service life measured in years. Across forty-two households, a dredging cycle is a substantial per-home sum.

So the test is whether the reserve study names the pond and any outlet structure as their own lines with dates and figures. The pond is the single item most often missing from a reserve study altogether.

The wooded lots raise the ownership question. Where trees stand on association common ground, inspection, pruning and eventual removal are the association's cost and belong in the reserve study as a named line rather than in general grounds maintenance. Where they adjoin on somebody else's land, durability depends entirely on whose — and the four possible answers look identical from a window.

For a home facing water or woods, that outlook is a real and priceable difference within one community — which matters more here than almost anywhere, because it is one of the few variables that does differ between these homes.

Flood plain status for a home near water is parcel-specific.

What the association documents decide

Buying a condominium unit means buying into a corporation as well as a home, and the corporation's condition is not visible at a showing. Four documents settle it: the master deed and its exhibits, the bylaws, the current budget and the reserve study.

The master deed defines what the unit actually is — where the boundary runs between unit and common elements, and what limited common elements are assigned to its sole use. That is the most misunderstood part of condominium ownership, and it decides who pays for a great many things.

The bylaws set the rules that govern daily life: what may be altered, what may be parked, whether units may be leased and how many at once, and how the board is elected.

The budget and the reserve study together answer whether the association is solvent. An association with thin reserves and a large component near the end of its life is not cheaper — it is a deferred bill with an unknown date, and it arrives as a special assessment.

Board minutes are where a coming expense, a dispute or a construction defect claim surfaces first, and they are the most informative document nobody reads. I go through the recent ones as a matter of course.

One Michigan detail worth knowing: condominium documents are amended by recorded instrument, so what is recorded governs regardless of what any summary says.

The Malletts Creek watershed

Malletts Creek is a tributary of the Huron River and the main outlet for stormwater runoff from the City of Ann Arbor. Its watershed is almost entirely urban and suburban, and much of the creek runs in underground piping beneath the built-up parts of the city rather than in an open channel.

The number that explains its behavior is impervious cover. Close to thirty-seven percent of the land surface draining to Malletts Creek is impervious — roofs, roads, driveways and parking lots — which means rain that would once have soaked into ground arrives at the creek quickly and all at once. A watershed like that responds sharply to heavy rain rather than gradually.

This is public, documented ground. The Washtenaw County Water Resources Commissioner — the office formerly called the drain commissioner — is the authority for stormwater management, flood control and drainage across the county, and Malletts Creek has its own drainage district. Substantial public money has gone into the creek, including a restoration project that created a constructed wet meadow to hold and slow stormwater.

The practical consequence is that drainage is a specific question rather than a general one. The Water Resources Commissioner's office holds the drainage district records; and the city's stormwater staff can say what work has been done near a specific address and what is planned.

None of that is a reason to avoid the area — it is some of the most established residential ground in the city, and the public investment is a reason for confidence rather than concern. It is a reason to ask at the parcel level instead of assuming.

An Ann Arbor address is not necessarily the City of Ann Arbor

The City of Ann Arbor is ringed by townships — Scio, Pittsfield, Ann Arbor, Superior and Lodi among them — whose mailing addresses read Ann Arbor. A mailing address is a delivery route rather than a jurisdiction.

Each township is a separate government with its own board, tax rate, services, zoning and assessor. The rate difference between a city parcel and a township one is real and recurring, which is why comparable sales must be matched on municipality. Rates and taxable values both change, so compare the current millage and the parcel's own taxable value rather than a remembered difference; a tax bill arrives on the local schedule, and a lender collects an estimated share of it monthly.

School assignment follows a third line again and tracks neither the municipal nor the postal boundary. There are examples running in both directions: a subdivision with Ann Arbor addresses, Pittsfield Township taxes and Saline schools; and, elsewhere in Pittsfield Township, a community assigned to Ann Arbor Public Schools. Neither is derivable from the address.

Match comparable sales on district as well as on municipality.

Four tiers of protected open space

Where open ground adjoins a property, ownership is the first thing that decides whether it stays open — but not the only one.

Land held by a public body is generally the most durable, though a public body can still sell or repurpose land. Land under a recorded conservation easement is next — an easement runs with the land, surviving a change of owner and of local board. Association common area is real protection that the owners themselves pay for. Unbuilt private land carries the least protection of the four, but that is not the same as none: zoning, recorded deed restrictions and state wetland regulation can each constrain what may be built, filled or cleared, and EGLE requires authorization for specified activities affecting regulated wetland.

From a window all four look identical, which is why it is worth checking the record rather than the view: ownership, any recorded easement or restriction, the zoning, whether wetland is mapped, and whether a development application has already been approved.

Buying or selling here

Position and condition are the whole of the pricing here, because size is not a variable.

For a seller, that is an argument to make rather than assume. A model will produce nearly the same figure for every home in the community; a well-positioned, well-updated home is worth more than that, and the case has to be built from what the home actually faces, whether it is an end unit, and dated records for the roof and mechanicals.

Community details reflect public records and local knowledge and can change — always verify what matters to your purchase. Explore more of Ann Arbor's neighborhoods, or browse active listings.