Fifth Avenue Condos

Three penthouses above offices in the Weinmann Block, a nineteenth-century building revived in 2002

At a glance
LocationCity of Ann Arbor, downtown, in the Weinmann Block on East Washington
BuiltLatter half of the nineteenth century; expanded and revitalized in 2002
HousingThree penthouse units above three floors of office space; a mixed-use condominium
SchoolsAnn Arbor Public Schools
ParkingDowntown structures, lots and metered streets run by the Downtown Development Authority; monthly permit availability varies by facility and permit type
NearbyKerrytown, Main Street, State Street and South University districts; the University of Michigan campus and medical center on foot
EraNineteenth-century original: knob-and-tube wiring, galvanized supply pipe and lead paint possible in surviving fabric; the 2002 systems, sealants and roofing reach end of life around 20–25 years, a storage water heater sooner

Era notes describe what a build date makes likely across houses of that period. A year built is not proof of what any one property contains: materials, alterations and equipment are established from the records and an appropriate inspection.

School assignments can shift over time. Confirm the assignment for a specific address — the district and the individual school — with the school district.

Ask about Fifth Avenue Condos
Answered personally within one business day. This also creates your free account, so you can come back without a password and keep your details current. Your details are never shared.
The neighborhood

About Fifth Avenue Condos

Fifth Avenue Condos is a collection of three units in the heart of downtown Ann Arbor, in the historic Weinmann Block on East Washington — a building originally constructed in the latter half of the nineteenth century and expanded and revitalized in 2002.

The building holds three floors of office space with the upper floor housing the penthouse units, which makes this a mixed-use condominium rather than a residential one.

Worth knowing
  • —Three residential units above three floors of offices — a mixed-use condominium
  • —Commercial and residential uses share costs; the master deed sets the split
  • —An adaptive reuse is two buildings at once, and the joints are the questions
  • —A masonry building built to breathe can trap moisture when sealed modernly
  • —The 2002 work is itself twenty-five years old and has its own cycle

A mixed-use condominium is a different purchase

Residential units above commercial space in one condominium is a common downtown arrangement and a genuinely different proposition from a purely residential building.

The building's costs are shared between uses, and how they are allocated is set out in the master deed. Commercial and residential occupiers use a building differently — different hours, different loads on elevators and services, different insurance profiles, different demands on the entrance and any shared circulation. A fair allocation is normal and workable; an unexamined one is where disputes come from. Read how the assessment is apportioned between the commercial and residential elements, and what each contributes toward the roof, the facade and any shared plant.

The commercial space's own economics also reach the association. A vacant floor still owes its assessment, but a struggling commercial owner is a harder counterparty than a resident, and a change of commercial tenant can change the building's hours, deliveries and noise without any residential owner having a say.

That can narrow which loans are available — at purchase and again at resale, which affects the pool of buyers a seller can reach.

A nineteenth-century building, revived in 2002

The Weinmann Block dates from the latter half of the nineteenth century and was expanded and revitalized in 2002, which means a buyer is looking at two buildings at once — an original structure and a comprehensive intervention roughly twenty-five years old.

That layering is where the questions live, as it is in any adaptive reuse. The original fabric brings load-bearing masonry, original framing of a quality no longer available, and the settlement and movement of well over a century. The 2002 work brings modern systems, modern insulation and modern egress inserted into that fabric — and the joints between the two are what to examine.

Specifically: how the new mechanical, electrical and plumbing runs were routed through original structure; how the roof and any new openings were flashed into old masonry; and whether the original walls were treated in a way that lets them manage moisture as they were built to. A masonry building constructed to breathe, sealed with modern materials, can trap moisture in ways that show up slowly.

The 2002 work is itself now twenty-five years old, which puts its own components — sealants, roofing, mechanical plant, finishes — at or approaching the end of typical service lives. A revitalization is not permanent; it is a generation of work with its own cycle.

For the original fabric, ask what documentation survives from the 2002 project. A well-run conversion generally leaves drawings and specifications, and where those exist they are worth far more than any inspection can reconstruct.

Three units, which is the smallest arithmetic there is

Three residential units in a shared building is about as concentrated as condominium ownership gets, and the consequences are arithmetic rather than opinion.

A roof, a facade repair or a mechanical replacement divides among a very small number of parties. There is essentially no dilution: each owner carries a substantial fraction of every major expense, and a single significant repair arrives as a special assessment of real size. In a mixed-use building the commercial owners share that too, in whatever proportion the master deed sets — which is another reason to read the allocation carefully.

The good side is real. Three owners can make a decision in an afternoon. There is little scope for an unresponsive board, and no need for an expensive management contract. Everyone knows the building.

But it makes the reserve position more consequential rather than less, and in a building this small there may be no formal reserve study at all — in which case that absence is the answer, and a buyer should price for it rather than assume it means nothing is due.

Fifteen historic districts, and why that is a parcel question

Ann Arbor has fifteen historic districts, and downtown sits among several of them — including the Old Fourth Ward Historic District, one of the city's first residential areas, bounded by Huron to the south, Glen to the east, High Street to the north and Detroit Street to the west.

Whether a specific building falls inside a district is a parcel-level question that the city answers, not a neighborhood-level impression. Individual buildings outside a district can also carry their own designations.

The difference is practical rather than symbolic. Inside a district, exterior work generally requires review by the Historic District Commission before it proceeds — street visibility is not a general exemption, and rear elevations, outbuildings and site features are covered too — which constrains what an owner may do and on what timescale. For a condominium that mostly falls on the association rather than the individual owner, since the association typically owns the exterior, but it shapes what any renovation program can be and how long it takes.

The upside of designation is real and often understated. A district will not be redeveloped in the ways an ordinary block might, which makes the streetscape around a building considerably more predictable than the market would otherwise allow. In a downtown that continues to build, that predictability is worth something.

Ask the city about the specific address, and ask the association whether any exterior work is pending review.

Parking is the downtown question

In a downtown building, parking is not a detail. It is frequently the single largest difference between two otherwise similar units, and it is the thing buyers most often assume rather than verify.

Downtown Ann Arbor has over 8,000 parking spaces across structures, surface lots and metered street parking. The system is a City of Ann Arbor asset managed by the Downtown Development Authority. Monthly permit availability varies by facility and by permit type, and some facilities carry a waiting list rather than an immediate purchase. On-street spaces are metered or otherwise restricted — typically between eight in the morning and six in the evening — so follow the posted signs, and check the DDA's current information before relying on off-site parking.

So the questions about a specific unit are precise ones. Does it come with parking at all? If so, how many spaces, and is each one deeded to the unit, assigned as a limited common element, or merely licensed by the association and revocable? Those three are legally different and worth different money. Is the space inside a structure or exposed? And can parking be sold or leased separately from the unit — some buildings allow it, some do not, and it matters both ways.

Where a unit has no dedicated parking, the fallback is a DDA permit, and the practical question is whether one is currently available in a nearby structure or whether there is a wait. That is a phone call, and it is worth making before an offer rather than after.

For anyone with more vehicles than spaces, or a household that needs visitor parking regularly, this is the constraint that most shapes daily life downtown — and it does not appear in a listing photograph.

What a downtown address actually buys

Downtown Ann Arbor is organized into four commercial districts — Kerrytown, Main Street, South University and State Street — each with its own character, and a residential address downtown puts a household inside that rather than adjacent to it.

That is a genuinely different product from a subdivision, and the differences run in both directions. What it buys is proximity measured in minutes on foot rather than in a drive: restaurants, the farmers market at Kerrytown, music venues, galleries, and the University of Michigan campus and medical center within reach without a car for most trips.

What it costs is space and quiet. Downtown units are generally smaller than a suburban house at the same outlay, outdoor space is a balcony or nothing, and a building in a commercial district is subject to the noise of one — deliveries early, restaurants and bars late, and event weekends several times a year. None of that is a defect; it is what a downtown is. But it is worth experiencing rather than imagining, which means visiting on a Friday evening as well as a Tuesday afternoon.

The durability of the amenity is worth noting too. A downtown supported by its own commerce is not a private club or a shared facility that can close, and the city's continued investment in it — through the Downtown Development Authority — is a public rather than a private commitment.

The documents, in order

The reserve study comes first, ahead of the inspection of the unit itself, because whatever the association is responsible for, its age lands on the association's budget rather than the owner's.

The five-year assessment history comes second and is more informative than the current figure. A single-level unit assessment across five years against ageing common elements is a question rather than a reassurance — it can mean disciplined management or deferral, and the reserve study tells you which.

The master deed's division of responsibility comes third: which elements are general common, which are limited common and assigned to a particular unit, and which belong to the owner outright. In a downtown building that division commonly covers windows, balconies, the facade and any parking space, and it varies between associations.

Then the recent minutes, where a pending special assessment or a long-running dispute surfaces before it reaches a disclosure.

Buying or selling here

Two things dominate: the mixed-use structure, and the two ages of the building.

For a seller, the master deed's allocation between commercial and residential, and any documentation surviving from the 2002 work, are the two document sets that most change a buyer's confidence — and the second is the harder one to reconstruct later.

Community details reflect public records and local knowledge and can change — always verify what matters to your purchase. Explore more of Ann Arbor's neighborhoods, or browse active listings.